Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Oct 3, 2025

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

A4-Tacks and others added 16 commits October 1, 2025 22:45
Two places doing the same thing is enough to motivate me to extract this to a method :)
…bar-not-all-in-pattern, r=lcnr

only replace the intended comma in pattern suggestions

Only suggest to replace the intended comma, not all bars in the pattern.
Fixes rust-lang#143330.
This continues rust-lang#143331, the credit for making the fix goes to `@A4-Tacks.` I just blessed tests and added a regression test.
…thar

Extract common logic for iterating over features

Two places doing the same thing is enough to motivate me to extract this to a method :)
…r=fmease

Respect `-Z` unstable options in `rustdoc --test`

This PR makes rustdoc respect `-Z` unstable options when collecting doctests (`rustdoc --test`).

In the process I also realized that `--error-format` wasn't respected as well, making UI annotations impossible to write so I fixed that as well.

Best reviewed commit by commit.

Fixes rust-lang#147276
Fixes rust-lang#143930
r? fmease
Add xtensa arch to object file creation

Just something that was missed in the xtensa target PRs.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 3, 2025
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 3, 2025

📌 Commit 30442dc has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 3, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 3, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 30442dc with merge f4babc6...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #147245 (only replace the intended comma in pattern suggestions)
 - #147269 (Add regression test for 123953)
 - #147277 (Extract common logic for iterating over features)
 - #147292 (Respect `-Z` unstable options in `rustdoc --test`)
 - #147300 (Add xtensa arch to object file creation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
   Verifying foo v0.0.1 (D:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\tmp\cit\t2383\foo)
 Downloading crates ...
  Downloaded bar v1.0.0 (registry `dummy-registry`)
   Compiling bar v1.0.0
   Compiling foo v0.0.1 (D:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\tmp\cit\t2383\foo\target\package\foo-0.0.1)
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.59s

stack backtrace:
   0: __rustc::rust_begin_unwind
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 3, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 3, 2025
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 4, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 4, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 30442dc with merge a0f398e...

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Oct 4, 2025

msvc failure is tracked in #147321

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 4, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing a0f398e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 4, 2025
@bors bors merged commit a0f398e into rust-lang:master Oct 4, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.92.0 milestone Oct 4, 2025
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#147245 only replace the intended comma in pattern suggestions 823632bbfbb2941cdc3c69130f19b39ea565a7aa (link)
#147269 Add regression test for 123953 e6d43ed4b0f2576be199aef09c60fa1cb7bbab03 (link)
#147277 Extract common logic for iterating over features a5e9d3e62738bb76f7cf43ada29a686ba2433980 (link)
#147292 Respect -Z unstable options in rustdoc --test fa55f38d23003d9a2935ed235975b2e2046974ca (link)
#147300 Add xtensa arch to object file creation a91ab691b96334aeb2da787f9fc3655ae4a93d7a (link)

previous master: 7950f244e7

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2025

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 7950f24 (parent) -> a0f398e (this PR)

Test differences

Show 36 test diffs

Stage 1

  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-143930.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-147276.rs#crate_attr: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-147276.rs#normal: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/associated-types/projection-dyn-associated-type.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/suggestions/only-replace-intended-coma-not-all-in-pattern.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)

Stage 2

  • [ui] tests/ui/associated-types/projection-dyn-associated-type.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/suggestions/only-replace-intended-coma-not-all-in-pattern.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-143930.rs: [missing] -> pass (J2)
  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-147276.rs#crate_attr: [missing] -> pass (J2)
  • [ui] tests/rustdoc-ui/doctest/unstable-opts-147276.rs#normal: [missing] -> pass (J2)

Additionally, 26 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard a0f398e89df9767c93c81cd58d44fdba071258a8 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-x86_64-apple: 6570.0s -> 7916.6s (20.5%)
  2. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2584.3s -> 3038.0s (17.6%)
  3. i686-gnu-nopt-1: 8138.1s -> 7155.8s (-12.1%)
  4. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3712.1s -> 3300.1s (-11.1%)
  5. armhf-gnu: 4770.2s -> 5198.8s (9.0%)
  6. dist-riscv64-linux: 5409.4s -> 4974.0s (-8.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-2: 5862.5s -> 6233.1s (6.3%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-miri: 4649.0s -> 4367.8s (-6.0%)
  9. aarch64-msvc-2: 5220.5s -> 4905.7s (-6.0%)
  10. dist-apple-various: 3708.7s -> 3490.6s (-5.9%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a0f398e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.8%, secondary -1.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.9% [-1.9%, -1.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 473.406s -> 472.925s (-0.10%)
Artifact size: 388.33 MiB -> 388.34 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.